Literature reviews,
without the guesswork.

A research tool that scores every paper you open against your research question so you know what's worth keeping.

The Problem

Finding papers is easy.
Knowing which ones are any good isn't.

Every literature review starts the same way. Hundreds of papers, a deadline, and no quick way to tell a strong study from a shaky one. Judging evidence is a skill you're still building, and the tools meant to help either hand you a shallow summary or quietly write the thing for you, which your university now treats as cheating.

So you read everything by hand, or you trust a black box. Nexagen sits in between. It reads the full paper and tells you, in plain terms, how good the evidence really is for the question you're asking, so you can decide what to keep and what to skip.

How It Works

From your question to a
finished reference list.

Set Your Question

Tell Nexagen what you're researching. That's what every paper gets measured against.

Score as You Read

Open any paper and Nexagen scores it against your question, weighing the study's size, who it included, and its methods. It shows its working, so you learn what to look for.

Keep What's Good

Add the papers you'll use to your reference list. Each one is saved with its score and a short note on why it earned it.

Organise by Theme

Your sources get sorted into the sections of your review, with the parts that matter to your question pulled out for you.

Write It Yourself

Nexagen never drafts your work. It sorts and weighs the evidence. The thinking, and the writing, stay yours.

The Team

Built by the people
closest to the problem.

Toni Disu

Co-Founder · CEO

BSc Medical Innovation & Enterprise · MRes Medical Device Design and Entrepreneurship, Imperial College London. Background in medical devices, biomedical AI, and venture.

Tanvi Bhatla

Co-Founder · CSO

BSc Neuroscience · MRes Neurotechnology, Imperial College London. Expertise in neurobiological systems and computational methods applied to medical research.